I shouldn’t have to write this blog post. The fact that there is even a question about it demonstrates the desperation of the Democrat party. Should American citizens have to provide ID to vote?
The SAVE act means to require that all show proof of citizenship in order to register to vote and present ID at the polls. This is controversial? How? I don’t think I need to list all the places and events and actions you take every day where you need to present ID, do I? So why is it prohibitive to require ID to vote? |
| (image: pexels.com) |
To hear the Democrats bellyaching about it is a lesson in meaningless blather. First they tried to claim that people in rural areas may have difficulty getting to the nearest DMV to acquire an ID. Ridiculous. Chuck Schumer goes as far as to call the proposed law “Jim Crow 2.0”.
Well, he should know about that, since it was Democrats who invented and promoted and fought against abolishing Jim Crow laws. (Incidentally, it also puts Schumer’s own racism on display.)
But all those dead people who put Biden over the top in 2020 will be disenfranchised! All those non-citizens will have to show an ID that indicates citizenship! It will make it impossible to invent voters to cast votes for the Democrats! How will they possibly win?
And that is the crux of it. The Dems know their ideas are not popular. They know they don’t have anywhere near a majority of Americans on their side. Their only option, if they want to win, which they desperately do, is to cheat. Hence the hue and cry against the SAVE act.
My prescription for fair elections includes the following:
-Proof of citizenship to register to vote
-ID that indicates citizenship at the polls (if you’re not a citizen, your driver's license, which you shouldn't even have, will indicate “non-citizen”)
-ONE DAY voting, no mail-in voting, except for disabled or overseas citizens, no early voting, no phone voting, hold voting day on a Saturday, employers required to allow employees to leave work to vote.
-Anyone who doesn’t have proper ID may cast a provisional ballot. If the election results are close enough that the number of provisional ballots cast could change the outcome, then the ballots are confirmed or rejected, one by one, and counted.
-Close observation by each party during the counting process, as well as video surveillance of all counting centers. Votes are counted by hand, no more counting machines which can be manipulated. Strict chain of custody laws with body cams for transporting ballots. Tabulation of ballots and final election results must be filed within 48 hours of the close of the last national poll.
-Voter rolls purged ANNUALLY of dead people and those who have moved out of the district. (when someone registers in a new location after moving, that precinct notifies the previous precinct to remove them from their rolls. Not too difficult.)
-SEVERE consequences, including heavy fines and jail time, for those who cheat or attempt to cheat. At least 12 years post-election day before statute expires.
Is there anyone who can give me another reasonable objection to having voter ID? No, there isn’t. Because there is no reason. It simply diminishes the ability of the Democrats to steal elections. Simple as that.
Is there anyone who can give me another reasonable objection to having voter ID? No, there isn’t. Because there is no reason. It simply diminishes the ability of the Democrats to steal elections. Simple as that.
Do you agree with me? Leave me a comment! Please!
 |
| (image: stockvault.net) |
Kat
