![]() |
(pixabay.com) |
What Are They Thinking?
The ninth circus court has done it again! An absurd ruling, based on extreme liberal bias and contrary to their sworn oaths to uphold the Constitution and follow the law. Never fear, they will, once again, be overruled, assuming the Constitution eventually wins out, since it so clearly and unambiguously provides for the temporary travel ban that President Trump put in place.
Of course, there is always the fear, more and more so over the past eight years, that liberalism run amok could prevail, which would indeed be a tragedy and would only continue the downward spiral of our once glorious country. That is why this particular case carries so much weight. Not only because the original intent of the ban is being thwarted and our safety as a nation threatened, though that is a grave enough consequence, but because our very integrity and continued existence as a country is being threatened as well.
There is no question that the President has the absolute right to do what he did. The ninth circus court's primary objection seems to be that he can't prove to them that there is a threat sufficient to require the ban. Well he doesn't have to do that! Nowhere does it say that he must justify his actions in this regard to anyone! The President has access to very sensitive and confidential intelligence that can't and should not be shared with any idiotic court! It is not their purpose to satisfy themselves that President Trump made a GOOD decision, only whether or not he has the RIGHT to make the decision, which he clearly does.
Not only that, but let's have a DUH moment here, shall we? Do the members of the court not believe that travel from countries like YEMEN and SOMALIA without any ability to know who is coming or why is NOT a threat to the United States' safety? REALLY???? Anyone who doesn't live under a rock knows that those countries as well as the other five in the ban certainly DO pose a threat to the United States. All together, now..... DUHHHH!
And, as for the concern of the court that Trump's intention was to impose a "Muslim ban"... what possible difference does that make?? It would be one thing if he had intended a Muslim ban and then proceeded to impose travel bans on all countries with majority Muslim populations, but that's not the case! What his initial intention might have been is totally irrelevant. It is obviously NOT a Muslim ban, since most of the world's Muslim countries are not on the damn list! Another DUH! Since the court cannot read the man's mind, they must go on what is EVIDENT, and that is that certain countries who have a history of harboring, encouraging and exporting terror AND who are currently unable to provide citizens with reliable proof of identity were chosen for this temporary ban.
As usual, since the libs cannot win at the ballot box, they are attempting to create law and impose their will from the benches of our court system. Sadly, they have plenty of willing accomplices on those courts, due to Harry Reid's decimation of Senate procedural rules, allowing Obama to stuff the courts with liberals over the course of eight years.
![]() |
(morguefile.com) |
We must focus on regaining the integrity, nobility, and spirit of the United States as it was founded and supported by the Constitution of the United States. If the Constitution is the deciding factor, as it should be, then President Trump's ban will eventually go back into effect. In the meantime, I would not want to be one of these foolish judges when, God forbid, someone from Somalia who enters the U.S. this weekend ends up shooting up a mall or blowing up a plane a few months from now. Would you?
Kat
Truth - Self Evident to anyone with a modicum of sense and a cursory understanding of the Constitution and congressional legislation. Great Blog!
ReplyDeleteVery well said Kat!!!
ReplyDelete